Denigrating libertarianism

People try to figure out, and in large part explain away, libertarianism, at Slashdot and Reddit.

Share this

Invite them over

They can blog here and get thoughtful discussion.

Why leftists can’t understand how you can be a libertarian

They think they all libertarians worship Ayn Rand
They think libertarians are against environmentalism.
They think libertarians are selfish and don’t support the greater good.
They don’t understand how markets via diffusion of power protect individuals and increase the greater good.
They don’t know the historical lessons and the present ill effects of collectivism.
They think the reason government fouls up all the time is because the wrong political party is in power.
They think a far left government would not be beholden to special interest groups. Smart people with effective plans would take over and justice would prevail.
Some libertarians come across as wacky, whimsically junking all previous non- market constructs in favor of strict anarchy.
Some lefties see libertarians as cold heartless persons who are nerds. They are Nerds who see persons only as mathematical entities living their lives in game theory. Leftists on the other hand are warm puppy loving altruists.

Everyone thinks he knows what ideal liberty is but there are several mutually contradictory definitions.

Today’s cosmopolitan internationalist leftists define liberty as the ability to realize ones potentials. Since persons may differ in their fortunes through no fault of their own, there is an ethical duty that we should just feel, which tells us to make right this inequality. Thus people who are sighted are obligated to make blind people live lives equal to theirs even if it diminishes their own lives. If someone is not able to or does want to do productive work, all are obligated to care for these persons so that they flourish equally to others. Coercion is legitimate in order to bring into line anyone who does not agree with this imperative. This extends worldwide and is not satisfied until it is all equally realized. In other words leftists define liberty as fair equality of outcome for each individual without regard to luck, innate ability, effort or societal position.

Another way liberty can be defined is a correct ideal. In other words lives are lived as determined by ethical standards that are discoverable and are based on natural law which may be imposed from the top down by national law or international treaty. Life is not lived according to individual choices but as determined by rightly reasoned moral principles. These might include such things as justice, proper conduct, human dignity, autonomy. If you propose that there is a God the principles would be commanded by God but if you are atheistic they would just have to be what the anointed wise persons (see Thomas Sowell’s “Vision of the Anointed”)felt in their heart. Once this was determined, anyone who disagreed would have to defend their deviancy against the majority opinion. It would be rule by the philosopher kings. I think we tried this in the middle ages. It was called Scholasticism, Fascism or something.

A third idea about liberty is that life is to be lived is to be lived in a way as to maximize humanity as a whole; the greatest good for the greatest number. Here the individual is of no account but the community is everything all must conform to what is decided is best to accomplish this. This is the Confucian ideal. It is hierarchical, family oriented and paternalistic. Obviously if it is decided that the world is to be governed according to the above kinds of liberty, something has to give. Maybe the lefties will have to apply a little imperialism to them and make Confucians do the right thing. Or since they believe in both multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism they will have to go to a psychiatrist to deal with their psychic conflicts.

Fourth is libertarianism as freedom from interference. Here individuals are free to do as they want as long as they do not interfere with others, but are able to venture with others in a markets. If they fail, they have to find their own way out. This way is truly multicultural as it operates mostly by voluntary exchange, contracts and limited democracy in which government acts as a referee but is not Santa Clause, God or dictator. This is thin libertarianism but since we are talking about forms of government the thinner the better.

Blog entry

Dave, your comment is much more worthy of being a blog entry than the actual blog entry you're replying to.


Dave - submit that as a blog entry.